April displays conventional values, with relatively inflexible viewpoints, generally identifying with authority figures and finding weakness to be intolerable. One might consider her personality to be indicative of , which is one of the jurors' characteristics associated with verdicts.

One might consider her personality to be indicative of authoritarian, which is one of the jurors' characteristics associated with incorrect verdicts.

Explanation:

Authoritarianism is presented by people who are in a position of superiority where other citizens depend on their decisions and positions. Authoritarianism occurs when a person positions himself aggressively, based on extremely conventional values and ignoring contrary opinions and signs of weakness in other people. It also ignores individual citizens' freedoms and any attempt at counseling, which allows authoritarian people to misinterpret things in the right ways and end up making incorrect decisions. In relation to the question above, it can be considered that April's personality is indicative of authoritarian, which is one of the characteristics of the jurors associated with incorrect verdicts.

the first one is d and the second a

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.