The etic perspective . emphasizes similarities between all people attaches great importance to differences between cultural groups was less dominant in the early days of psychology than it is today seeks to emphasize the differences among people

The correct answer is emphasizes similarities between all people

Distributionism is an example of an ethical, external point of view about language, providing its description with only a starting point. To choose between the multiple rules and classifications that are simultaneously admissible from the distributional point of view, it is necessary to add to this description an ethical study, which characterizes the units by the function that the speaking subject confers on them. Pragmatics is the discipline that studies the principles of language in use, in which the speaker, speaker and context are the main categories that determine linguistic interpretation. For pragmatics, the meaning of words is a function of the action or actions that are practiced or can be practiced with them, taking into account the way in which contextual factors determine linguistic performances in communication situations.

tbh idk same thing here

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: