In looking at the USDA grading system, what should Jane and John consider? A. Pork is not graded. B. Veal and lamb use the same grades. C. The term "good" is used only with veal and lamb. D. All of the above

The correct answer is D. All of the above

Explanation:

In looking at the USDA grading system, Jane and John should consider that pork is not graded, Veal and lamb use the same grades, The term "good" is used only with veal and lamb.

Option D= All of the above.

Explanation:

The USDA is an acronym that stand for United States Department of Agriculture and it is saddled with responsibilities which concerns the safety with the intake of agricultural products (such as meats) of the people of the United States of America.

The United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) make use of grading system in order to grade the quality of meat. For instance, with the grading system the first five out of the eight grades of beat are good for human beings and they are U.S prime, U.S good, U.S choice, U.S utility and U.S standard.

The way the United States Department of Agriculture(USDA) beef is different from the way they grade pork while veal grading with that of beef is somewhat the same.

Thus, the options 'A' to 'C' are correct.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: