Inseparability
Susan goes to Magnira Spa to get a massage and asks for the best masseur in the spa. She knows that her experience depends on the quality of the masseur. Which of the following characteristics of service can be observed in this scenario? T/F

True                  

Explanation:

Inseparability is described as the distinguishable factor that represents a service has something that renders the fact that it is impossible to 'divorce' the production or supply of the distinct services from its associated consumption. However, other key features of various services would include variability, perishability, and intangibility.

According to the question given, the statement would be considered as true as it represents inseparability.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

can you explain it better