subject
Social Studies, 08.04.2020 18:34 cam012006p07816

What conclusion can you draw from the following part of the Georgia Constitution? "No person shall be eligible for election to the office of Governor or Lieutenant Governor unless such person shall have been a citizen of the United States 15 years and a legal resident of the state six years immediately preceding the election and shall have attained the age of 30 years by the date of assuming office." - Paragraph IV, Section I, Article V of the Constitution of the State of Georgia Question 2 options: The requirements to be Lieutenant Governor are stiffer than to be Governor. There are no differences in the qualifications for the two offices. The requirements to be Governor are stiffer than to be Lieutenant Governor. The Governor and Lieutenant Governor are elected individually.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:10
Where did the constitutional convention take place
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30
Did cuneiform develop the language we use today
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
Recall that in one condition of the experiment conducted by stasser and titus (1985) about student council president candidates, all group members had access to the same information, and that in another condition, members had unique information that other group members didn't know. in the second (unshared information) condition, the group made a worse decision than in the first (shared information) condition. this occurred because groups seldom can agree on who is most expert. focus discussion on the information that all members know. often ignore dissenting opinions. avoid differences of opinion, given conformity pressures.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What conclusion can you draw from the following part of the Georgia Constitution? "No person shall b...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 14.11.2020 04:20
question
English, 14.11.2020 04:20
Questions on the website: 13722360