N 1934, the governor of California declared martial law at the San Francisco docks to subdue a dock workers’ strike. The National Guard was deployed to disperse the strikers and given the power to make arrests and even put strikers on trial. While the governor threatened to place the entire city under martial law, this threat did not need to be carried out when the dock workers ended the strike and went back to work.
Based on this incident, under which principle would a state government be allowed to temporarily set aside the First Amendment right to assemble?

A) eminent domain
B) libel or slander
C) equal opportunity
D) clear and present danger

D

Explanation:

n 1934, the governor of California declared martial law at the San Francisco docks to subdue a dock workers’ strike. The National Guard was deployed to disperse the strikers and given the power to make arrests and even put strikers on trial. While the governor threatened to place the entire city under martial law, this threat did not need to be carried out when the dock workers ended the strike and went back to work.

Based on this incident, under which principle would a state government be allowed to temporarily set aside the First Amendment right to assemble?

A) eminent domain

B) libel or slander

C) equal opportunity

D) clear and present danger

the question deals with financial planning and the answer is that dan did not stay on budget due to the fact that this guy needs to start decreasing his discretionary spending. according to the financial plan, he needed to balance his expenses and resources.