G Explore the following scenario: You are outside taking your daily walk and just happen to witness a bank robbery. You make the decision to follow the perpetrator, who ends up going down an alleyway. Upon a closer look, you notice that he stops at an orphanage and gives them all the money. Would you: A) Report the man to police since he committed a crime ...OR... B) Leave him alone because you saw him do a good deed. Thinking critically, how would you go about making a decision on this

Explanation:

The most logical thing to do such situation would be reporting the man to police even if he gives all the money he stole to the orphanage.

We should consider the fact that the orphanage must be receiving some funds from the state as well as by other sources such as donations, welfare, etc.

If he truly wanted to help the orphanage, he could have worked and saved money to donate them. The man is wrong to rob a bank to help the orphanage in every legal perspective. No matter how much his reasons may sound sentimental and sacrificing, he did not do the right thing.He forcefully took someone else's money and gave it to innocent people. So that does not justify his deeds.

whitch constitution would be inadequate as a basis for government today?

the answer would be a) it only allowed catholics to be in government.

the density would be a smaller number.