For the purposes of Miranda, the case that established that the ultimate determinant of whether a person is in custody is whether the suspect has been subjected to formal arrest or to equivalent restraints on their freedom of movement was:.

The correct answer is TRUE.

Explanation:

The Miranda custody is more about making sure that the suspect of a crime is confined to a certain place in order to restrict the suspect's movement.

The two things that will triggers Miranda are; (1). When the suspect has been subjected to formal arrest; and (2). When there is a equivalent restraints on the suspect's freedom of movement.

According to the Miranda's right the suspect has the right to remain silence and not to say anything. Also, the suspect has the right to call for his or her lawyer.

a punishment or the threat of punishment used to enforce conformity. enforcement of norms or shared rules of conduct that tell people how to act in specific situations. social control. not everyone internalizes all of society's norms, and some people must be motivated by self-fulfillment.