In Collin v. Smith, 1978, the Court allowed a group called "followers of Nazism" to publicly and peaceably assemble to express their views in Skokie, Illinois, overturning local ordinances prohibiting this group’s assembly. What does the Court’s ruling say about the 1st amendment and the States?

The main principle that was derived under this decision is that the First Amendment also protects opinions from the unpopular people, for the fact that the opinion of the majority is protected already. Although the Nazis may have chosen a jewish community deliberately for their rally, it was however a peaceful rally and hence the state do not have any right to stop them. It also created a distinction between speech and action and protected the wearing of Swastikas as this cannot be banned, since there is a freedom of speech as mandated by the first Amendment. Thus, the court allowed the group to speak out their hatred other than allowing the government dictate for the citizens, what and what not to do.

Explanation:

the answer would be a)henry grady because he came up with the term "new south"

it all depends on how long the hours are. i think they wouldn't approve of it. in my opinion.