Social Studies, 17.04.2020 23:03 LaBreeska

Mike thinks that sitting around contemplating the meaning of existence is a waste of time. He spends his life concentrating on developing his career, building a bigger house for his family, and enjoying himself. Sartre and other existentialists would say that Mike is .
A) living in bad faith
B) preventing himself from becoming a functioning person
C) ignoring Mitwelt
D) following core ideas of self-determination theory

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:00

What recommendations would you give to your local community to to decrease the local effects of human impact on the environment? list 2 recommendations and how they will positively impact your community. 3. what recommendations would you give to the global governments to decrease the global effects of human impact on the environment? list 2 recommendations and how they will positively impact our planet.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:20

Using mr smith and his id, identify two potential internal validity threats that might affect the a—b design. tell me how that threat might impact conclusions in the a—b design. note #1: you cannot use maturation (since i already did that one for note #2: there are some mr smith id threats that won’t have much impact in a single case design.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30

Before they can be published, scientific papers must be peer-reviewed. this means that: a) some other scientific experts read the papers and guarantee that they are true.b) some other scientific experts read the papers and provide quality control by eliminating many mistakes.c) an editor reads the papers, to make sure that all the semicolons are in the correct places.d) everyone in the world is given the opportunity to comment on the papers through a specially maintainedblog.e) government bureaucrats read the papers, to be sure that the papers do not insult the political positions ofthe current officeholders.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:30

Ascientist successfully predicts the outcome of an experiment. you watch carefully and know he didn't cheat. the scientist's success shows that: a) the scientist knows absolute truth about this experiment; success is not possible unless you know the truthb) the scientist was just lucky; no one ever knows what's going on, so successful predictions require luckc) the scientist may know the truth, or at least know something that is close to the truth, or the scientist may have gotten lucky this time; you can't be absolutely sured) the scientist really was cheating, even though you didn't see the cheating; no one can get things right, except by cheatinge) the scientist spent the night at a particular hotel chain and go a free breakfast, giving the scientist the ability to do amazing things

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Mike thinks that sitting around contemplating the meaning of existence is a waste of time. He spends...

Questions