Lawanda just didn't want to change her stance on capital punishment, but Jack's argument did make her think twice about her position. However, instead of being persuaded, Lawanda dismissed the arguments by deeming Jack's facts unreliable. How has Lawanda responded to her own cognitive dissonance in this instance:
A. By reinterpreting Jack's message.
B. By attacking the credibility of Jack's sources.
C. By simply refusing to listen to the remaining points.
D. By seeking information from another source.

B.By attacking the credibility of Jack's sources.

Explanation:

Cognitive dissonance is a psychological term that refers to a situation which involves conflicting attitudes, beliefs or behaviors.

This then gives rise to a feeling of mental discomfort leading to a change in one of the attitudes, beliefs or behaviors to alleviate the discomfort and restore balance.

Lawanda responded to her own cognitive dissonance in this instance by attacking the credibility of Jack's sources.

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development  

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.

acts of terrorism occur globally. the united nations global counter-terrorism strategy was created in order to build adequate systems of support and solidarity with victims of terrorism. here´s a summary of the proposed key themes: the importance of giving victims a face and a voice; protecting their dignity; giving victims legal status and defending their legal rights; providing victims with medical, psycho-social and financial support; building solidarity with victims; improving media coverage of victims; and focusing on the link between victims and counter-terrorism efforts more generally.