The gender similarities hypothesis in the context of gendeVincent believes that gender roles are determined by how an organism changes and adapts itself to the environment. He proposes that an organism's role in sexual selection and its reaction to selection pressures determines the gender differences among organisms. In this case, Vincent is proposing the approach to gender. r differences in cognitive ability suggests that

The gender similarities hypothesis in the context of gendeVincent believes that gender roles are determined by how an organism changes and adapts itself to the environment. He proposes that an organism's role in sexual selection and its reaction to selection pressures determines the gender differences among organisms. In this case, Vincent is proposing the evolutionary pschology approach to gender

Explanation:

Evolutionary psychology is a synthesis of modern psychology and evolutionary biology. It utilizes the logic of the evolutionary theor to examine human behavior and mental processes.

In particular, evolutionary psychology is concerned with the origins and functions of charactaristically human behaviours and mental activity and how the were (And now may or ma not be) adaptive in responding to particular classes of stimuli. It integrates concepts and research from evolutionary biology with basic psychological phenomena.

The gender similarities hypothesis in the context of gendeVincent believes that gender roles are determined by how an organism changes and adapts itself to the environment. He proposes that an organism's role in sexual selection and its reaction to selection pressures determines the gender differences among organisms. In this case, Vincent is proposing the evolutionary pschology approach to gender

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals