The use of a third party to intervene to help resolve a conflict: a. Is useful because it can allow both sides to make concessions while saving face. b. Can help to reduce emotional issues and focus both sides on the issues. c. Requires the agreement of both sides in order to work. d. May cause each side to harden its position and make compromise more difficult. e. All of the above are true.

A.passes laws and adopts budgets b.resolves disputes among members c.ensures legislation is applied fairly d.represents the eu globally a recent challenge to the european union created by a member state is a.migration b.free trade c.brexit d.the euro which is the most powerful position in the british government? a.the monarch b.the chancellor c.the prime minister d.the president which describes a constitutional monarchy? a.a monarchy in which a king or queen has all the power b.a monarchy in which the people elect the king or queen c.a representative government with a mostly ceremonial ruler d.a representative government with only one set of written laws

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.

What are your feedback for online class? good or bad?