subject
Social Studies, 22.04.2020 16:30 mandoux

What argument could you make that flag burning is likely to cause violence and
therefore should be against the law?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
You are serving on a jury. a plaintiff is suing the city for injuries sustained after falling down an uncovered manhole. in the trial, doctors testified that it will be 5 years before the plaintiff is able to return to work. the jury has already decided in favor of the plaintiff, and has decided to grant the plaintiff an award to cover the following items: a. recovery of 2 years of back-pay ($34,000 for two years ago, and $36,000 for last year, which ends today). assume that it is december 31 and that all salary is received at year end. this recovery should include the time value of money. b. the present value of 5 years of future salary. assume that the plaintiff's salary would increase at a rate of 3 percent per year. c. $100,000 for pain and suffering. d. $20,000 for court costs. assume an interest rate of 7 percent. what should be the size of the settlement?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:20
In piaget's stage, you would expect one to develop interest in ethics, politics, and social and moral issues.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
Two police officers stopped a car for a minor traffic violation. while one of the officers dealt with the driver and the traffic violation, the other officer talked with the passenger. seeking to question the passenger about gang involvement, but lacking reasonable suspicions of criminal activity, the officer ordered the passenger out of the car. as the passenger exited the car, the officer saw a bulge in the passenger's coat which the officer suspected might be a gun. upon patting down the passenger, the officer felt the handle of a revolver and removed the gun. the passenger, who was a convicted felon, was charged with the possession of a gun by a prohibited possessor. prior to trial, the defendant sought to suppress the gun as evidence, contending that its seizure was unconstitutional. should the court suppress the gun as evidence? ayes, because, since the car had been stopped for a traffic violation, the officer could not order the passenger, who had not committed the violation, to exit the car. byes, because, since the officer lacked reasonable suspicion that the passenger was engaged in criminal activity, the officer could not pat down the passenger. cno, because a valid traffic stop gives an officer the right to pat down a passenger. dno, because the gun was discovered as a consequence of a valid terry stop and frisk.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:30
How did the end of the mexican american war result in growing sectionalism in the united states?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
What argument could you make that flag burning is likely to cause violence and
therefore shoul...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722360