Iobey the law more often if there s a chance that i might get caught.

The above statement is one of the observances of the law. Which one chose to obey the law if he made a mistake.

Humans are social creatures that live side by side with one another, therefore humans need laws to limit the pattern of excessive human action, thus harming the community or others.

If humans live without law, then the pattern or way of society will fall apart and cause chaos or conflict. And so do humans who live without the law will lose tolerance among humans. This is what happens when humans begin to set aside tolerance.

If people obey the law, there will be regularity, mutual respect for others. And tolerance in the community will be created and there will be a balance, where the pattern of life of one community will not harm the lifestyle of other communities.

Why does the state punish someone?

It must be because humans violate and disobey the law.

Legal compliance is compliance with the law, in this case, written law. Obedience or obedience is based on awareness.

There are three factors that cause people to obey the law:

Learn More

Compliance of Law link

Law Function link

Details

Class: High School

Subject: Social Studies

Keywords: Compliance, Law, Social

hello

question:

when would a new household be started?

a.when the oldest male died

b.when a man and a woman married

c.when the house could not hold everyone

d.when a child was born

answer: us d when a child was born

hope this have a great day and brainlest

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.