For Augustine, the belief that God knows in advance how humans will conduct their lives :

a. means that they are relieved of guilt for their actions, because they could not possibly control what they do.

b. does not mean that they do not have free will because they do not know themselves what that life wll be.

c. means that humans need to embrace Brahman as the agent of control in their lives.

d. means that God has a responsibility to help them understand their fate.

Option B

Explanation:

According to Augustine, there exists a difference in God’s will to  

a)Something occurring necessarily  

b)Something occurring voluntarily.

He further states that necessity does not preclude freedom by comparing the sufficient conditions for necessity and sufficient conditions for freedom.

He said that God’s foreknowledge is about necessity while man’s power/will leads to freedom. He equate freedom with power while maintaining free will

Option B is correct

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

the answer is in the us third parties have yet to win the presidency hope this ! can you mark brainliest?