subject
Social Studies, 06.05.2020 07:15 ximena68

Subbscribe to skeppy or idot Any questions

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:00
Create a lawsuit between neighbors based on a negligent tort. write your summary about the case. be sure to include the case title, summary of the event, what happens in the courtroom, the verdict, as well as the penalty. if the defendant is not guilty, then under the penalty section you must give an explanation as to why.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
Aresearcher conducts a focus group to learn about attitudes towards hygiene and disease prevention. two weeks after the focus group, the researcher learns one of the subjects had a heart attack at home and was hospitalized, but made a full recovery. based on dhs regulations, the researcher report this event to the irb? no, this does not need to be reported since the subject had the heart attack when they were home, not at the focus group.no, this does not need to be reported since it is unrelated to participation in the study.no, this does not need to be reported because two weeks have passed.no, this does not need to be reported since the subject recovered.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
Should the city pass a ban on skateboarders on all public property, or are the citizens who oppose the ban right when they argue that there are benefits to having the skateboarders in public parks? plan and write a response in which you state your position and persuade readers to agree with you. support your position with reasons and examples drawn from the proposed amendment to ban skateboarding and from information in the letters to the editor, as well as from your own experience.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Subbscribe to skeppy or idot Any questions...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 17:50
question
Mathematics, 26.02.2021 17:50
Questions on the website: 13722361