Andrew agrees to paint Betty's house for $2,000. Two days after he starts the job, he decides that $2,000 is not enough money. He refuses to finish the job unless Betty agrees to pay him $1,000 more. What law applies to this fact situation

a. The acceptance of additional money to settle a disputed claim is supported by consideration.
b. A past obligation is sufficient consideration for a new promise.
c. Andrew gives no additional consideration in return for modification of a preexisting contract.
d. Betty has made a promise in exchange for a forbearance.

i think its a

Explanation:

The Concept of Legal Sufficiency

As suggested in Section 11.1 "General Perspectives on Consideration", what is required in contract is the exchange of a legal detriment and a legal benefit; if that happens, the consideration is said to have legal sufficiency Something of value enough to constitute consideration..

1.) question:

how was the agricultural revolution related to the industrial revolution?

d.) improved agriculture led to population growth, which increased demand for goods.

2.) question:

which of the following happened first in the events leading to american independence?

c.) the meeting of the first continental congress.

3.) question:

what was one advantage that cities offered businesses and industrialists?

answer:

d.) transportation networks

4.) question:

what economic philosophy developed in response to the problems of industrial workers?

a.) socialism

5.) question:

how does this image relate to the jacobins?

b.) the jacobins used this machine to scare and execute those who supported the king.

hope this !