In Homefront: A Military City and the American Twentieth Century, anthropologist Catherine Lutz describes how militarization includes not only the production of military objects, but also the glorification of war and those who make war. Identify whether or not these are dangers of unchecked militarization noted by Lutz.

a. Danger of Unchecked Militarization:
b. Unchecked militarization can shape cultural institutions to its own ends.
c. Unchecked militarization dehumanizes the act of killing.
d. Unchecked militarization can create a hegemonic way of thinking.
e. Not a Danger of Unchecked Militarization:
f. Unchecked militarization amplifies the scientifically proven human tendency toward violence.

Catherine Lutz's defines militarization as the shaping of national histories in ways that glorify and legitimate military action and that a major goal of militarization is to make people accept and love war, and see it as normal.

Explanation: Danger of Unchecked Militarization:

I. Unchecked militarization can shape cultural institutions to its own ends.

II. Unchecked militarization dehumanizes the act of killing.

III. Unchecked militarization can create a hegemonic way of thinking.

The three dangers above as observed by Lutz support her writings about militarization shaping our reality as it has been incorporated into almost all facets of life from entertainment to fashion to toys. All these directly and indirectly influence and shape our societies.

Not a Danger of Unchecked Militarization:

I. Unchecked militarization amplifies the scientifically proven human tendency toward violence.

european feudalism was a combination of legal and military customs in medieval europe that flourished between the 9th and 15th centuries. broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

japanese feudalism. the era of feudalism in japan took place from the 12th through 19th centuries. during that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence.

the answer is a quran