The Supreme Court has said this regarding freedom of religion:
"The freedom of religion embraces (deals with) two concepts (ideas)-the freedom to believe and the freedom to act. The first is absolute but, in the nature of things, the second cannot be."
In a few sentences, tell me what the Supreme Court means in this quote. You should also give at least two examples to make it clearer.

The Supreme Court means that a person has the freedom to believe whatever they wish, that cannot be changed, and they can't be prosecuted for that. The freedom to act for their religion is not absolute however, as a person might commit a crime and say they were acting on behalf of their religion. If the second sentence was to be absolute, many crimes would be committed everywhere, and many people would go uncharged for their crimes.

Explanation:

A person shooting another person, and saying they did so for their religion.

A person stealing a large sum of money, burning it, then saying they acted under their religion.

european feudalism was a combination of legal and military customs in medieval europe that flourished between the 9th and 15th centuries. broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

japanese feudalism. the era of feudalism in japan took place from the 12th through 19th centuries. during that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence.