What Statement supports how meat consumption can be used to determine a nation’s developed

I can't find your options but I will explain meat consumption and its effect on countries.

Explanation:

Meat consumption depends to a great extent on accessibility, cost and custom. Meat creation is an exceptionally intricate activity depending not just on request (which is generally founded on cost and pay) yet on numerous social and financial impacts, for example, official strategy, value bolster systems, and interrelations, for example, the cooperation among hamburger and milk creation, the accessibility of creature feedstuffs and rivalry for food among man and creatures.  

It is hard to make precise correlations of meat utilization between nations in light of the fact that various techniques are utilized to evaluate utilization. Figures might be gotten from absolute supplies accessible at discount level, or from records of family unit buys, with or without appraisals of what is expended away from home; the gauge of waste, both in planning of the food and by the individual adds to the vulnerability. Some national appraisals neglect to incorporate imports, and a few studies incorporate the heaviness of non-meat parts of the items (for instance the measure of meat in an item can extend between 100% in certain burgers to 10% in certain pizzas). FAO Food Balance Sheets are set up from figures for creation, imports, stock changes and fares with remittances for feed, handling and "different uses" and similar strategies are applied to all areas so the figures, as in Table 1-1A, are practically identical.  

Up to a specific degree of pay the measure of meat eaten shifts with pay, in the moderately well-to-do western existence where the extent of accessible pay spent on food has been consistently falling over the past age, there is nearly nothing if any distinction between the measures of meat eaten by the diverse salary gatherings. This diverges from the Third World nations (FAO 1990a).  

The measure of meat devoured in various nations shifts massively with social, monetary and political impacts, strict convictions and topographical contrasts. It is huge in meat-creating territories, for example, Uruguay, Argentina, Australia and New Zealand, at 300 g for each head every day contrasted and a normal of 10 g in India Indonesia and Sri Lanka Table 1-1A shows the differentiation between all out meat supplies in created and creating nations, taking into account fares, imports and stock changes, and Table 3-1 shows that the creation per capita in the previous is five fold the amount of as in the creating nations. These tables likewise show the overall size of creation of the various kinds of creatures included.

Meat is held in high regard in many networks. It has notoriety esteem, it is frequently viewed as the focal food round which dinners are arranged, different kinds of meat are once in a while made the premise of happy and celebratory events, and from the famous just as the logical perspective, it is viewed as a food of high nutritive worth.  

While unmistakably meat isn't basic in the eating regimen, as witness the enormous number of veggie lovers who have a healthfully satisfactory eating routine, the consideration of creature items makes it simpler to guarantee a decent eating regimen.  

There is a stamped distinction right now in perspectives towards meat between the individuals of the creating and industrialized networks In the previous where meat is hard to find it very well may be taken as a proportion of the healthful nature of the eating regimen all in all.