This passage is from the end of then-Senator Barack Obama's November 2007 Speech on the "American Dream." "There has been a lot of talk in this campaign about the politics of hope. But the politics of hope doesn't mean hoping that things come easy. It's a politics of believing in things unseen; of believing in what this country might be; and of standing up for that belief and fighting for it when it's hard. America is the sum of our dreams. And what binds us together, what makes us one American family, is that we stand up and fight for each other's dreams, that we reaffirm that fundamental belief—I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper—through our politics, our policies, and in our daily lives. It's time to do that once more. It's time to reclaim the American dream." The purpose of placing the line, "what makes us one American family, is that we stand up and fight for each other's dreams, that we reaffirm that fundamental belief—I am my brother's keeper, I am my sister's keeper," at the end of his speech is to

b. encourage the audience to show its belief in America and what it could be.

Explanation:

According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:

a. use denotative language to establish emotional distance and show his reserve.

b. encourage the audience to show its belief in America and what it could be.

c. offer examples and details to give his audience concrete support for his argument.

d. leave the audience with a lasting impression of his authority and credibility.

In this text, then-Senator Obama talks about what he believes America to be. He reminds Americans of the importance of hoping for things that have not come yet, believing in a promising future and fighting when things are difficult. Obama wants all Americans to take part of this challenge and do their best for their country. The line mentioned in the question is meant to emphasize the importance of the participation of all people in this project. By using it, Obama encourages the audience to show that they believe in America and in what it could be.

the answer is tom watson. tom watson created this epitaph because he wanted to increase the sympathy felt by people towards the murder of mary phagan.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.