Tami’s parents used to pay her an allowance every week to feed the cats and to do a few other chores around the house. However, once her mother lost her job, her parents stopped giving her an allowance. Although Tami quit making her bed every morning, she still continued to feed the cats. Which of the following best explains why Tami continues to feed the cats? A. Without the extrinsic reward, the task itself is eliminated. B. With the extrinsic reward, the execution of the task relies on internal motivation. C. Without the intrinsic reward, the execution of the task relies on external motivation. D. Without the extrinsic reward, the execution of the task relies on internal motivation. E. With the intrinsic reward, the execution of the task relies on external motivation.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.