Social Studies, 22.05.2020 21:11 Bra1nPowers

Read the excerpts from the two articles on sea otters.

Article A

Sea otters display many unique physical features and behaviors that make them extremely interesting animals. They play and interact with one another, showing a high level of intelligence. Both scientists and wildlife enthusiasts enjoy observing them. Perhaps you'll be lucky enough to spot some of these fun, furry creatures along the shores of the Northern Pacific or, at the very least, at your local zoo.

Article B

What can be done?

There are laws that protect sea otters from being hunted for their fur now. However, there is more to be done. People can continue to demand that the government increase protection against oil spills in the ocean. They can also ask for stricter fishing laws that protect the sea otters. Keeping the oceans clean will also help sea otters. We all need to do our part to protect these special creatures!

How are the authors' points of view different in these excerpts? (2 points)

Article B focuses on what humans can do to protect sea otters while Article A focuses on how humans can enjoy sea otters.
Article B proves that oil spills endanger sea otters while Article A proves that even scientists think these animals are smart.
Article B focuses on the specialness of the sea otter while Article A focuses on the special ways to observe the sea otter.
Article B includes highlights the danger of water pollution while Article A makes it clear that pollution is not a problem.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patronâ€™s painting. the artistâ€™s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artistâ€™s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:40

How we perceive, use, study, structure, interpret, and react to messages of time is referred to as: ?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 09:00

One way in which the european union encourages trade among countries is through the use of

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30

Open opinion / / / should juveniles spend life in prison? why? or why not?