subject

The Miranda ruling--along with other landmark Warren Court decisions, such as Mapp v. Ohio (forbidding admission of illegally obtained evidence) and
Gideon v. Wainwright (providing attorneys for poverty stricken criminal defendants)--changed the rules of the game in significant ways. The decisions
ensured a fairer balance between individual rights and the state's interest in criminal prosecution. For the most part, supporters of those decisions say,
the new rules stopped the infamous "third degree" by police during interrogations--physical coercion in the form of beating suspects with a rubber hose,
for example or plunging a suspect's head into a toilet. Occasional cases of brutal police interrogations still make the news, but police investigations
overall are more professional and physical abuse has declined, longtime observers say.
CLAIM: The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona established necessary protections for those accused for a crime.
Which argument from Source A supports this claim?
what answer

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 17:30
An economic system where all or most businesses are owned by government
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
Passage 2 — from catherine beecher, “treatise on the domestic economy”it appears, then, that it is in america, alone, that women are raised to equality with the other sex; and that, both in theory and practice, their interests are regarded as of equal value. they are made subordinate in station, only where a regard to their best interests demands it, while, as if in compensation for this, by custom and courtesy, they are always treated as superiors. universally in this country, through every class of society, precedence is given to woman, in all the comforts, conveniences, and courtesies, of life.in civil and political affairs, american women take no interest or concern, except so far as they sympathize with their family and personal friends; but in all cases, in which they do feel a concern, their opinions and feelings have a consideration, equal, or even superior, to that of the other sex.in matters pertaining to the education of their children, in the selection and support of a clergyman; in all benevolent enterprises, and in all questions relating to morals or manners, they have a superior influence. in such concerns, it would be impossible to carry a point, contrary to their judgment and feelings; while an enterprise, sustained by them, will seldom fail of success.if those who are bewailing themselves over the fancied wrongs and injuries of woman in this nation, could only see things as they are, they would know, that, whatever remnants of a barbarous or aristocratic age may remain in our civil institutions, in reference to the interests of women, it is only because they are ignorant of them, or do not use their influence to have them rectified; for it is very certain that there is nothing reasonable, which american women would unite in asking, that would not readily be bestowed.the preceding remarks, then, illustrate the position, that the democratic institutions of this country are in reality no other than the principles of christianity carried into operation, and that they tend to place woman in her true position in society, as having equal rights with the other sex; and that, in fact they have secured to american women a lofty and fortunate position, which, as yet, has been attained by the women of no other nation.analysis1. when beecher speaks of women’s “best interests” and their “true position in society,” what does she mean? 2. according to beecher, what trade-offs must american women make to obtain their “lofty and fortunate position” in society? in your view, is it a fair exchange? 3. according to beecher, in what realms do women naturally and legitimately exercise power? 4. on what grounds does beecher base her faith that american women can attain anything they “reasonably” ask, and how does she explain any “remnants” of bad treatment that might remain in the present?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
How was mussolini able to gain power in italy? he played to the prejudices of the italians. he fought off hitler’s attempt to annex italy. he led a coup to take over a weakened government. he proposed new ideas to solve the economic crisis.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:40
Multiple-choice the word "democracy" means: (a) "rule by the people" (b) "minority rule" (c) "individual rights" in a democracy, election results are protected against dishonesty by: (a) laws (b) customs (c) values the type of government in which the people are represented by elected officials is sometimes called a: (a) monarchy (b) republic (c) totalitarian state in most democracies, the only legal requirements for voting or holding public office are based on age, residence, and: (a) religion (b) citizenship (c) personal wealth in an election, political parties give voters a choice among candidates who tend to represent different: (a) ethnic groups (b) religious groups (c) interests and points of view
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The Miranda ruling--along with other landmark Warren Court decisions, such as Mapp v. Ohio (forbiddi...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2022 15:50
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2022 16:00
Questions on the website: 13722367