Summarize the two different camps of thought on the life cycle of Pfiesteria. Which set of arguments do you find more appealing? Defend your answer. How would you go about resolving this controversy? What studies and/or findings are needed to help in this process? Given there is an active controversy in the scientific community on the Pfiesteria life stages, should public policy decisions be made when the scientific community is not in agreement? What would happen if action on this problem were delayed until the controversy was resolved? What if action were taken without all the "facts" known?

answer; /// i believe the correct answer is (wine) ; /// good luck

it looks like its all of the above. [.wpal1kojopfdpojfrfionrnif.knfdsnksjosjo]

explanation:

you have to combine all of your answers together to

.wpal1kojopfdpojfrfionrnif.knfdsnksjosjo

if you are on the computer you can not take a picture but you can upload one but i am not sure about phones but i'm pretty sure it's the but to upload one just click the paper clip looking thing/ link thingy thing and upload a pic

well it depends i think people around the world are coming around to gay marriage. but if you are talking abortion then wow, so much to talk about. such as men thinking they have the right to choose if women can, the fact there are health concerns if the women can't get one, and many more arguments to discuss. so i would definitely say abortion would be a much more interesting topic.