In your original post, describe one instance where a word or phrase was used that offended you by way of culture, age, power, or gender. Explain why you found the word or phrase offensive, whether you think the speaker was trying to offend you or if that person felt the comment was innocent (or even flattering), and describe how you reacted to the situation. Please remain ethical and do explain how the word was used within the context of the situation.

The description of the given question is described in the explanation section below.

Explanation:

A day, my child said, "You're very much loud as well as disturbing." When he was on the mobile device, I told him an interesting issue. He posted this comment just after the mobile. It was bullying me.

question - in 1827, john walker, a druggist in a small english town, tipped a splint with sulphur, chlorate of potash, and sulphid of antimony, and rubbed it on sandpaper, and it burst into flame. the druggist had discovered the first friction-chemical match, the kind we use to-day. it is called friction-chemical because it is made by mixing certain chemicals together and rubbing them. although walker's match did not require the bottle of acid, nevertheless it was not a good one. it could be lighted only by hard rubbing, and it sputtered and threw fire in all directions. in a few years, however, phosphorus was substituted on the tip for antimony, and the change worked wonders. the match could now be lighted with very little rubbing, and it was no longer necessary to have sandpaper upon which to rub it. it would ignite when rubbed on any dry surface, and there was no longer any sputtering. this was the phosphorus match, the match with which we are so familiar. according the paragraph what was the benefit of the new phosphorus match? it burst into flame when rubbed on sandpaper. it was made by mixing chemicals. it could be ignited on any dry surface. it threw fire in all directions.

answer - matches required natural chemicals

answer; the above statement is false