Considering the current rules regarding permissible conduct by unions to promote themselves and permissible conduct by employers to fight union encroachment, which side do you think the rules tend to favor and why? Do you think such favoritism is deliberate in the legislative design? Why or why not

The rule seems to favour the union as a result of the fact that, they would be the ones to negotiate and promote the welfares of the employees against the employers. This would be inform of wage increment as well as protection of employees from undue job loss.

The favouritism is not deliberate in the legislative design but rather due to well taught out action due to series of previous experiences.

Explanation:

jacksonian era promoted strength of the presidency and executive branch at the expense of congress. it also sought to broaden the public's participation in government. the jacksonian's demanded to have elected judges, instead of appointed judges, and rewrote many state constitutions to reflect the new values. hope this ! if you did find it would you mind giving me brainliest? : )