PLZ ANSWER FOR BRAINLIEST, 5 START, A THANKS, AND I'LL FRIEND YOU Enthusiasm is a crucial aspect to finding success at work, and in this lesson Ian Wagner talks about why enthusiasm is important. He says that it's crucial because: 1. People are drawn to people who are enthusiastic; and 2. We work most of our lives and should have fun at work and be enthusiastic about our job. Ian then challenges us to walk into the bathroom, look into the mirror, and say, "I am excited, I am excited, I am excited, I am excited," and then continue to say it when you go to eat your breakfast. He says that you can alter your thoughts and emotions by even faking it until you feel it. What evidence can you draw from other sources, information, or text that can support any claim Ian made in his lesson or from the writing above? Write a supportive analysis and post your research findings, links or discoveries here. plz wright in your own word I do not want a "sample answer"

When recursive formula can be used to determine the total amount of money earned in any year based on the amount earned in the previous years?

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

While acknowledging that there are greater employment opportunities for latin american women in cities than in the countryside, social science theorists have continued to argue that urban migration has unequivocally hurt women's status. however, the effects of migration are more complex than these theorists presume. for example, effects can vary depending on women's fin?