Daniel's work placed him in a group of 5 to demonstrate a new method of taking inventory of the store's products in less time. Two of Daniel's group members do not seem interested in contributing. Daniel begins to get frustrated that his goal of completing the task is blocked. Daniel remembers that is better than , especially when .

cooperation; aggression; most people cooperate

Explanation:

Two of Daniel's group members do not seem interested in contributing. Daniel begins to get frustrated that his goal of completing the task is blocked. Daniel remembers that cooperation is better than aggression, especially when most people cooperate.

It is better to try to cooperate with others than to be aggressive. Aggression can have the effect of pushing people away or putting them under pressure which can invariably lead to lower quality work.

In this case it is better that Daniel tries to cooperate with the other 2 members who are interested in contributing as they still constitute a majority. When the other 2 see this, they may become encouraged to join in the discussion.

If Daniel responds with aggression, it might even push away the other 2 members that seem interested in contributing because they may not feel comfortable working with him.

in this scenario it would be the consumer demand as most influential in making the decision. the band members need to figure out where and from whom they will make the most money, in other words who out of the two consumer groups - football fans or car drivers - will spend their money, who is more likely to contribute to their cause and buy what they are offering.