A witness is called in a contract action between a plaintiff and a defendant. The witness takes his oath and testifies. During cross-examination, the defendant's attorney asked the witness this question: "Isn't it true that even though you took an oath to tell the truth so help you God, you are an atheist and don't even believe in God?"Upon the proper objection, will the judge require that the witness answer this question?A Yes, because the question is relevant to the witness's character for truthfulness. B Yes, because instead of taking the oath, the witness could have requested to testify by affirmation without any reference to God. C No, because evidence of the beliefs or opinions of a witness on matters of religion is not admissible to impair credibility. D No, because an attack on the competency of a witness must be made at the time the witness is sworn.

The arrival of the conquistadors affected every indigenous people group they encountered. in this activity, you will write letters from the point of view of an incan and a conquistador. research the topic on the internet or at the library before writing. each letter should contain at least two paragraphs and be at least eight sentences long. 1) you are an inca and the conquistadors have arrived in your village! write a letter to be sent to other incan villages. describe your thoughts about the conquistadors and how their arrival might change your life. 2) write a letter from the point of view of a conquistador meeting the incas for the first time. address the letter to your family back in spain.me! i would really appreciate it! my dog died this morning and we are trying to fill out a form for her. it would amazing if you could me on this.

What city was divided between communism and democracy/capitalism after world war 2

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.