Which of the following best describes the Wilmot Proviso? The Wilmot Proviso was a document that called for slavery in any territories that became new states.
The Wilmot Proviso was a document that called for a ban on slavery in any territories acquired from Mexico.
The Wilmot Proviso was a document that allowed settlers in the territories to vote for or against slavery.
The Wilmot Proviso was a document that extended the compromise line across the new territories.

Aresearcher is studying women recently admitted to a state prison. all potential subjects must have children under the age of five. research subjects will be given a basket of toys to use at their children’s first visit that the children can then take home. in assessing this proposal, the irb needs to determine that the toys are: age appropriate.not an excessive incentive.educational.of high quality.

Which is the most accurate description of the executive office of the president? groups of advisers who the chief of staff groups of advisers who the president groups of advisers who oversee national security groups of advisers who oversee the economy

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.