Which of these is a limitation of inferences to the best explanation? most of reality cannot be explained

it will never be as convincing as deductive inference

it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates?

it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates

Explanation:

Inference to the best explanation is a term generally in logic or philosophy, which describes a form of inductive reasoning where by individuals draw from the premises about an incident to an explanation for that particular incident.

This explanation is often a claim or reason given, as to why the incident is the way it is. For example: in the occurrence of a particular phenomenon named to be A. Premises B provides the best explanation for A. Therefore, it is most likely that B is true, even though there is no certainty or guarantee of its truth.

Hence, a limitation of inferences to the best explanation is that, "it depends upon our coming up with the right explanation as one of the candidates."

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development  

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.