If a person has been discriminated by the government on the basis of the fact that he or she is an illegitimate child, the regulation will be evaluated under .

Intermediate scrutiny.

Explanation:

This is seen to be the second level of making decisions using judicial standards or form. It is a less rigorous method or approach than the main scrutiny in approach or the dealing of certain issues when they arise. This is mostly seen in the US.

For an intermediate scrutiny to be really valid in a context or law that is about to be made to be abided in, the challenged law must posses:

i). Further an important government interest

and ii). Must do so by means that are substantially related to that interest.

Also, it can be classified to be less rigorous than strict scrutiny, but more rigorous than the rational basis test. Intermediate scrutiny is used in equal protection challenges to gender classifications, as well as in some First Amendment cases.

the answer might be either a or c. can't be too sure , because i searched the web, but no valid answers came through.

classical republicanism, also known as civic humanism, is a form of republicanism  developed in the renaissance inspired by the governmental forms and writings of  classical  antiquity, especially such  classical  writers as aristotle, polybius, and cicero.