Which of the following best describes the logic of scientific inquiry? Which of the following best describes the logic of scientific inquiry? If my observations are accurate, they will support my hypothesis. If my hypothesis is correct, I can expect certain test results. If my prediction is correct, it will lead to a testable hypothesis. If I generate a testable hypothesis, tests and observations will support it. If my experiments are set up right, they will lead to a testable hypothesis.

How did the spanish prove to be excellent allies in the war? give examples?

In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.

How did the nazis lead germany to war in europe and, with their collaborators, kill millions—including systematically murdering six million jewish people?