Small, kin-based groups that hunt and gather over a particular territory and constantly break up and reform in response to conflicts are referred to as what

Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?

Aman and woman agreed to burn down a neighbor's house in retribution for some wrong the neighbor allegedly committed against them. both the man and woman were arrested shortly after they poured gasoline on the neighbor's front porch. the man revealed to the police that he participated in the plan to ensure that nothing bad would happen to the neighbor, and that he had made an anonymous telephone call to the police alerting them to the crime, which enabled the police to arrest him and the woman in the act. the woman stated that she would not have participated if not for the man's encouragement. if the woman is charged with a conspiracy at common law to commit arson, how should she be found?

as discussed in your text, henry molaison (h. m.) lost extensive tissue in the inner part of both temporal lobes, including the hippocampus and amygdala in both hemispheres. in her research, brenda milner found that molaison could learn a new procedural task, mirror tracing, as well as typical control participants did. however, he could not remember the details of the task. this outcome suggests that