An employer reasons: "If I train my workers, competitors who save money by not providing training will be able to attract my trained workers with higher salaries than I can pay." What possible solution for this employer would most accord with the author's high road?

An employer reasons: "If I train my workers, competitors who save money by not providing training will be able to attract my trained workers with higher salaries than I can pay." What possible solution for this employer would most accord with the author's high road? A) Support regulatory policies that penalize firms for failing to train workers. B) Train workers who agree to repay the tuition if they leave within a set time. C) Concentrate on recruiting workers who have been trained by other firms. D) Cut costs elsewhere to match the higher wages paid by competitors.

B) Train workers who agree to repay the tuition if they leave within a set time.

Explanation:

The employers recruit freshers and people with no working experience to get their services at low wages. This helps the employers to get their work done and the freshers get some experience of working. According to the given situation the employer if trains the workers then there is a risk that the competitors may hire them but if the employer puts a condition on workers that they have to repay the tuition if they leave the job within a set time. This will compensate for the training cost and effort to some extent and workers can be bound to work.

the chair is the committee member from the majority party who has the most seniority. in the south carolina senate, the chair is the committee member from the majority party who has the most committee seniority.

answer; /// the above statement is (true);