Sasha believes that she is a nice person. To confirm this, she asks all her friends whether she is a nice person and they all agree that she is. Sasha concludes that she is a nice person and says she has evidence of it. However, she does not ask any of her enemies whether they think she is a nice person. This is an example of which of the following? A) Cherry-picking of evidence
B) Availability heuristic
C) Fourth cell reasoning
D) Overconfidence
E) All of the above are examples of "thinking what we want"

The correct answer is A.

Explanation:

Human beings have a tendency to selectively collect or remember information, or to interpret it skewed in order to confirm their own beliefs. Cherry-picking of evidence basically consists of choosing the part of the data that gives you the reason, to confirm a certain position, ignoring that evidence that may be different or contrary to the proposition that is being defended. Sasha used this fallacy to confirm her position about being a nice person.

50% i think

explanation:

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development  

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.