subject
Social Studies, 07.10.2020 14:01 Hellopeople233

"No person except a Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States." Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States Constitution
Which phrase accurately completes this excerpt from the Constitution?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 14:50
Derek is working on a thesis on the changes in social behavior in the context of finding partners. an important part of his study concerns the various practices followed by males and females over the course of generations and how they have gradually transformed into our current social norms. derek can be called a(n) psychologist. (tb75)\
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
The structure of the federal bureaucracy is well-known as being large and complex. which of the following is not part of the federal bureaucracy?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00
By the 1820s, many americans wanted to have an equal number of senators from the free states and the slave states. to achieve that, what would need to be true? sorry, the correct answer is: explanation review you answered: questions answered 11 time elapsed 00 17 08 hr min sec challenge stage 2 of 3 get 5 of 6 correct
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
"No person except a Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 10.06.2021 02:10
question
Mathematics, 10.06.2021 02:10
question
Mathematics, 10.06.2021 02:10
question
Mathematics, 10.06.2021 02:10
Questions on the website: 13722360