Answers: 3
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Karin bought illegal firearms at a gun show. at her trial, she alleged that she had committed this crime because her boyfriend had threatened to harm her and her two daughters if she did not. her lawyer asked the judge to instruct the jury that the prosecution had an obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that karin had acted freely. instead, the judge told the jury that karin had the burden of proving duress by a preponderance of the evidence. who is correct?
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:40
I'm in a few lessons on eastern europe and i need me don't leave me hanging. : {
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 19:30
Can someone explain and give me two examples of checks and balances in usa government right three examples
Answers: 1
Discuss respect in terms of conducting research...
Computers and Technology, 22.10.2020 16:01
Geography, 22.10.2020 16:01
Mathematics, 22.10.2020 16:01
Mathematics, 22.10.2020 16:01