Correspondence from Bernardo de Gálvez to John Campbell. And I, who am indignant at my own credulity and the noble manner in which it is pretended to hallucinate me, must not, nor do I wish to, hear other propositions than those of surrender, assuring your Excellency, that as it will not be my fault, I shall see Pensacola burn with the same indifference, that I shall see its cruel incendiaries perish upon its ashes. God keep your Excellency many years. Island of Sta. Rosa, March 22, 1781.

–“Diary of the Operations against Pensacola,”
Bernardo de Gálvez

Which statement best explains Gálvez’s intentions for the remainder of the siege?

He vows to protect the city at all costs even if it means losing the fight.
He intends to keep fighting until Campbell surrenders, even if the city burns.
He declares his troops will go into hiding to escape the fires Campbell has set.
He plans to honor their agreement to protect the city, even if Campbell does not.

Describe at least three effects of the drug war in mexico.

Alexander hamilton was one of the most important of the founding fathers. which of the following is he responsible for? select all that apply.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.