What's relevant to the problem/solution the EcoPeace Middle East?

Ecopeace Middle East is a group that is intended to bring the people of Jordan, Palestine and Israel together to protect the environment.

Here are several problems that they might face along with the solution:

- Problem: Political tensions between the members

The conflict between Palestine and Israel has existed for more than 50 years. Even though there are a lot of people who wanted to end it and achieve peace, it still have to face the challenge from some groups who prefer to resorted to violence.

Solution: Be very clear about the groups goals and distancing themselves from the political issues.

The group have to be very clear that they are here for their common progressive interests. They wanted to protect the environments. This will benefit both countries in the long run so there is no reasons for other people to intervene.

- Problem: Climate change denier.

Some of the people still haven't believed that climate change is an issue. Since reservation of environment require most people to change their habits, this create a huge problem for the group

Solution: Be patient. The group have to be aware that People's habit can't change instantly.  Try to lead by example rather than being judgmental toward those who do not share their views.

answer; i believe the answer is 80%, plz check first good luck;

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.