An editorial is a primary source true or false?

True and false

Explanation:

If it is written by someone who experienced the event it's primary so true. But, if it is an example like this, from 2018 that describes the same event but uses it to provide background information about current events would be considered a secondary

well since twins have about the same dna they dont have one think in common which is the figer print. nobodys fingerprint is the same. if your using twin you would most likely get around the same results for both of them because of the genetics.. i hope this