NO ONE IS HELPING ME PLEASE IM FINNA CRY I SWEAR I BEGGING YOU PLZ NO COPY AND PASTEING PLEASE 1. What is different when studying the text versus studying the data sets?

2. How is the information the same? How is the information different?

3. Do you get more information from the text or the data? Why?

4. Which kinds of sources are difficult to study? Why?

5. Does one type of document tell the complete story on its own?

6.What is most important to know about the Columbian Exchange and why?

We we ask what a text means, we are inquiring, at least in part, about its a general idea or insight conveyed by the word in its entirety.

Chris, a master at office gossip and innuendo, says, "we know we have a corporate spy someplace in the organization, probably on the management team itself. there is no evidence that it is audrey. in fact, she's too clean, if you know what i mean. somebody should fire audrey; she's got to be the spy." by making this argument chris is actually engaging in (a) an appeal to emotion fallacy (b) a straw man fallacy (c) an appeal to ignorance fallacy (d) circular reasoning (e) an appeal to the mob fallacy

Name that largest artificial lake built in the 11th century