Define Federal democratic republic and state

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Miniver cheevy's foolishness is clearly on display in the fifth quatrain. how so?

According to the world bank, e.u. remittances to senegal were $1,005,728,139$1,005,728,139 in 2015. senegal's gross domestic product (gdp) was $13,779,570,750$13,779,570,750 in 2015. what percentage of senegal's 2015 gdp is represented by the remittances? round your answer to one place after the decimal. remittances as percent of gdp: %% based on the washington post article, e.u. launches $2 billion plan to keep africans from migrating, which explanation correctly explains why senegal's government would or would not implement policies to restrict illegal migration from senegal to the european union? because remittances represent such a large percentage of senegal's gdp, senegal's government faces an incentive to do nothing to stop illegal migration to the european union. because remittances are sent from senegalese workers in senegal to their family members in the european union, senegal's government faces no incentive to crack down on illegal migration. because remittances represent such a small percentage of national income, senegal's government does not find it worth its time to implement policies to prevent illegal migration. because remittances are sent from senegalese workers in senegal to their family members in the european union, senegal's government faces a large incentive to crack down on illegal migration.