Two justices dissented, stating that a person is "in custody" when he or she feels restricted. They argued that the Court of Appeals was correct when it said that Alvarado felt restricted. Based on this fact, he should have been given a Miranda warning to make him aware of his rights. Which answer best describes the minority opinion? Alvarado did not need to have his rights read. Officers made sure that Alvarado knew his rights. Alvarado was actually in custody, because he felt restricted. Officers did not pressure Alvarado into confessing.