Which statement BEST EXPLAINS the effect of the Dred Scott decision? A. The Supreme Court ruled that slavery was illegal in southern territories.
B. The Supreme Court ruled that the federal government could stop slavery in the territories.
C. The Supreme Court’s decision benefited the slave owners and said that slaves were not citizens.
D. The Supreme Court denied the legal rights of the southern states and their institution of slavery.

C. The Supreme Court’s decision benefited the slave owners and said that slaves were not citizens

Explanation:

Dred Scott v. Sandford (1856) was a Supreme court case whereby the court decided that blacks shouldn't be given American citizenship and the constitutional rights that are enjoyed by American citizens doesn't apply to them.

The court ruled that slaves were just properties of their owners and that they shouldn't become citizens. Therefore, the Supreme Court’s decision benefited the slave owners.

credit card number 4 is the right answer

colony: virginia

1: 1607,john smith

2: british were looking for gold and land

3: near oceans and theres forests

4: fishing? ithink

5: sometimes