subject

. . . [A] great portion of that time which ought to have been devoted calmly and impartially to consider what alterations in our federal government would be most likely to procure and preserve the happiness of the Union was employed in a violent struggle on the one side to obtain all power and dominion in their own hands, and on the other to prevent it; and that the aggrandizement of particular states, and particular individuals, appears to have been much more the subject sought after than the welfare of our country . . . . When I took my seat in the Convention, I found them attempting to bring forward a system which, I was sure, never had entered into the contemplation of those I had the honor to represent, and which, upon the fullest consideration, I considered not only injurious to the interest and rights of this state but also incompatible with the political happiness and freedom of the states in general. From that time until my business compelled me to leave the Convention, I gave it every possible opposition, in every stage of its progression. I opposed the system there with the same explicit frankness with which I have here given you a history of our proceedings, an account of my own conduct, which in a particular manner I consider you as having a right to know. While there, I endeavored to act as became a free man and the delegate of a free state. Should my conduct obtain the approbation [act of approval] of those who appointed me, I will not deny it would afford me satisfaction; but to me that approbation was at most no more than a secondary consideration—my first was to deserve it. Left to myself to act according to the best of my discretion, my conduct should have been the same had I been even sure your censure would have been my only reward, since I hold it sacredly my duty to dash the cup of poison, if possible, from the hand of a state or an individual, however anxious the one or the other might be to swallow it . . . .

THE QUESTION: Why, according to Luther Martin, did he walk out of the Constitutional Convention?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 05:10
Which of the following was not a result of early humans increasing proficiency at finding food
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00
Which technological breakthrough of the 1950s revolutionized the way that americans kept up with news and world events? a) radio b) internet c) television d) motion pictures
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:00
The most likely reason why an ancient greek might worship more than one god is that?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00
Peggy feels sorry for smokers who have lung cancer because she believes they were duped by tobacco companies to develop a deadly addiction and are therefore not responsible for their disease. when asked to donate money to support lung cancer research, peggy gives generously. peggy’s prosocial behavior can best be explained by the arousal: cost-reward model. the negative state relief model. a norm of equity. attributions of responsibility.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
. . . [A] great portion of that time which ought to have been devoted calmly and impartially to cons...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 09.04.2021 19:20
question
Mathematics, 09.04.2021 19:20
question
Chemistry, 09.04.2021 19:20
Questions on the website: 13722363