According to the Anti-Federalist Papers, are the Bill of Rights necessary? Why or why not? Cite evidence from at least one of the Anti-Federalist Papers to support your claim.

Explanation:

The Anti-Federalists felt that a Bill of Rights was necessary.

Here is an excerpt from the 46th Anti-Federalist paper:

In this quote, the Anti-Federalists state that the legislative branch is given great , but not restricted power. The Anti-Federalists worried the government would be powerful and out of control. They believed a Bill of Rights would protect the people and their freedoms, in case the government tried to rob the people of their rights.

i'd have to with d.

explanation:

the following men who did not in the unification of italy were.

a) giuseppe mazzini

c) alexander ll

the other two men were camilo cavour and giuseppe garibaldi they the unification of italy by yielding territories in the italian unification. in 1861 italy was declared a united-nation state under the sardinian king victor immanuel ll.