subject
Social Studies, 07.12.2020 22:20 cxttiemsp021

In Worcester v. Georgia, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Cherokee were a sovereign nation not subject to US federal or state laws. state of Georgia had a right to forcibly remove the Cherokee from their land. state of Georgia had authority over the affairs of American Indians within its borders. Cherokee had to be paid by Georgia for the rights to their homeland.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:20
As our current atmosphere formed, the concentrations of various atmospheric gases fluctuated. match each gas with the explanation that best describes how its proportion changed during the evolution of the atmosphere.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
Who won the debate over ratifying the constitution
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:40
What are your feedback for online class? good or bad?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In Worcester v. Georgia, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the Cherokee were a so...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 21.09.2019 12:30
question
History, 21.09.2019 12:30
question
Mathematics, 21.09.2019 12:30
question
English, 21.09.2019 12:30
Questions on the website: 13722361